Tuesday, 27 November 2012

Three Sisters: Annotated Script


LO 1.1/1.2 An example of my annotated script for Three Sisters, I believe when preparing a role or during rehearsals it is appropriate to mark on your script; in my case I highlight and I question things about the character I would like to find out later, or explore suggestions my peers/fellow actors have said to me during rehearsals which I could use to improve my character. I don't just annotate my own lines I believe you should consider the other characters and your relationship/interactions with them.

At the moment Olga's main interaction is with Irina, the youngest of the three sisters, I can sense a lot of tension; at this present moment it time I'm playing it that this is due to jealousy Olga feels towards Irina's youth and freedom; whilst feelings like she has to take on the parenting role to look after her.

The fact Olga is a teacher is giving me the impression that she blurs the lines of home and school, she takes her authority home with her, and this is suppressing to Irina.

Wednesday, 14 November 2012

NLP: Seminar With Paul


 Lesson with Paul:

Tuesday 13th November 2012

NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) has been brought up quite frequently by Paul, in all honesty I have never heard of the term before, and upon primary research I could not see how it linked in with drama.  

LO 3.1 But as I read on and I saw that NLP was all about how to actively use your mind and your emotions and your body to run your own life more successfully and to communicate with other people with 'extraordinary' effectiveness’. I realised these are all the qualities a good actor needs, they need to be in touch with who they are mentally and physically so their quirks don’t rub off on the characters they play.

 For me as an individual and actor getting more skilled in NLP is appealing because it will enable me to:

  • v  Do whatever I already do reasonably well, even better (who doesn’t want that?)
  • v  Acquire skills and attitudes to do what I cannot do right now, but would like to be able to do
  • v  Think more clearly
  • v  Communicate more effectively with others
  • v  Manage my thoughts, moods and behaviours more effectively.
                                                                              (How I wish to be as an individual)

 During this morning’s session Paul lead the class through a light NPL activity in which you are directed through a dream sequence of your own creation; but you are asked to do things such as follow the people within the dream or build rooms and think about the exact colour objects are.

 The entire class was asked to lie in a supine position, close their eyes and try to relax as much as a possible, relaxation is important for an actor because a A tense mind is one that will hold you back and keep you on the "safe" road (Prior Aphter); I believe this is very true especially when I recall moments when I had been tense on stage and those tense moments have caused me to forget about submerging myself into the character.

 Instead I concentrated on my own nerves and urgency to recall my lines not live in the moment like it was all happening new to my character.

 After achieving a relaxed state I closed my eyes and listened to the first prompt, “you are laying on a beach somewhere, starring up at the blue sky”. This may not sound like such a hard thing to visualise however the ‘external event’ for us was a cold winter morning in a cold room where the air vent couldn’t be turned off. I now realise this is a form of NLP where you must combat external events and distort/change or create an internal event.

 I was so absorbed within the dream that despite the cold weather I felt myself getting warmer, I think this is a great result because as an actor I can use this tool in future to immerse myself in the world of any character I’m playing and forget about external factors; it will be especially good for ‘Three Sisters’ because I have to imagine myself in there world, amongst their furniture and ornaments in a totally different time period.

During the activity we were lead through to other destinations within the world be had mentally created, and we were asked to follow a character. The dream was very vivid it felt like a panoramic HD film and I remember following a little girl in a red dress with long black hair to her home, we were asked to look into their eyes; I remember feeling a state of utter calmness coming from the little girl, this juxtaposed with how I thought she would feel, as a little girl being all alone. 

This taught me a valuable lesson as an actor, I may assume something about a character but eventually they may morph and grow from assumption.


Bibliography

Aphter Prior, Mar 15 2012 , Online article : http://voices.yahoo.com/film-acting-importance-mental-relaxation-to-11102850.html?cat=40  (Accessed 13/11/2012)



Monday, 12 November 2012

Acting Unit 10 : Three Sisters


An Actor Prepares

 LO 1.1 For me the first thing I do when I receive a character in a scripted piece is to read the text, this may sound like a obvious conclusion, how else would I fulfil my role as an actor if I do not know the words?

But I believe there are many ways to read, there is the commonly known sight and skim reading, for me when I receive a script I must skim read it and get to the end as fast as possible (there are exceptions to this rule however), I do this because I do not want to get absorbed in the plot of the narrative that is the job of the audience in a realistic or naturalistic play. 

What I want to get absorbed in is the objectives and subplot of what is being said by and to my character and looking at the relationships of the characters to each other. I do this on a second reading of the text (which normally happens right after the initial reading) in which I take more time to read and look at syntax; I do this because the way the playwright, in this case Anton P Chekov, places certain words are like clues to the actor about an underlying issues for e.g “I remember when they carried father out, the band was playing, at the cemetery they fired shots in his honour [...] but even so not many people came to the funeral.” This was said by Olga, the character I’m playing, in the opening scene: straight away this let me into the world of the character and has me thinking about the influence that father would have had over my character as a person.

1.      He was ‘general and commanding officer of a brigade’ the military background made me think of regimental behaviour that was taken into the home life, so he would have wanted order at home, did that mean Olga and her siblings had to be quite as children, did she loath him and love him at the same time?

2.      Did the lack of such a strong presence in her life make her feel weak and lacking in direction because she no longer had an outside source to tell her what to do?

3.      Why if ‘father’ was so highly esteemed did hardly no one turn up to the funeral and why is Olga making excuse “but of course there was heavy rain and snow” is she making excuses for herself or Irina and Masha as they are in the room listening to her.

4.      Although there are many questions rose for me I already have an idea of how I want to deliver that line, “but of course there was heavy rain and snow”, I can feel sarcasm and bitterness ebbing from the words, that is my subplot but my objective is to sound reassuring for the sake of my sisters. I believe Olga is bitter towards the people who didn’t turn up to the funeral but realising what she had said she didn’t want to make her sisters upset so she tries to make it sound flippant but my subplot is creating an obstacle that makes what I’m saying sound sarcastic.



Bibliography

Three Sisters , Chekov P Anton, Ledger R Gerald translation, 1998, Script

Wednesday, 7 November 2012

Acting: Introduction to Three Sisters, Paul


Tuesday 6th November

Acting: Paul

In the morning session Paul introduced us to the play that we would be working on this term, ‘Three Sisters’, by Anton P. Chekhov.


The play is set in Russia and the characters are all Russian, it was published in 1900 and performed in 1901, it is said that Chekhov was (possibly) inspired by the Bronte sisters when he wrote this play. Having read the play I can see how this could be true, the talent all three sister possess with language and education and a yearning for life is relatable with the Bronte’s and their misfortunes.

We will be working with the first act of the play, the class was separated into two groups and we were assigned roles by Paul. The splitting of the groups is a productive idea because our class size is bigger than the characters cast list, smaller groups means everyone has a part to work with that they can develop.

The character I have been assigned is Olga, the eldest of the three sisters, she is 28 years old; she is the matriarch figure of the family since their father died “exactly a year ago, on the fifth of May”.

I am glad to be playing Olga because I think it will be a challenging role and because she is a complete juxtaposition to me as a person. When developing her I will have to consider her relationship with her siblings, the line between parent and sister will get blurred thus I think conflict will arise in her interactions with them, due to herself imposed authority.

 


Wednesday, 31 October 2012

First Voice Seminar: Ellie


Wednesday 31st October

Lesson by Ellie: Voice

To begin today’s session Ellie lead the class in a vocal warm up in which we repeated the phrases “Bunny Bunny, tikiki and ooha” .

Bunny Bunny” Was said if you where the person pointed at in the middle, you would then have to do bunny ears, people on either side of the individual in the middle would then progress to say “tikiki” whilst the mass group would do a gesture and say “ooha”.  The purpose for this activity, I believe, was to gently ease us into the topic of voice in a creative and fun way, whilst warming up or vocals chords; and making our ensemble concentrate, due to the games nature being one of speed and group participation we all needed to be focused.

This activity was followed by another basic warm up that focused on alleviating tension in the body. We lied on the floor in a supine position (flat back legs on the floor) and also in a half supine (knees pointed up feet flat on the floor).  Whilst in these positions we did stretches to loosen the rib cage to allow for easier intercostal breathing.

Intercostal breathing is breathing into and filling the top third of the lungs, as in clavicular breathing, and then continuing to breathe into the middle part of the lungs.

Intercostal (“between the ribs”) breathing is accomplished by pulling up the clavicle, shoulders and torso, and then expanding the chest wall and ribs.

Intercostal breathing is useful for a performer because it allows for deeper breath inhalation which doesn’t stress the throat muscles. For a performer having to do a long monologue this technique would help pace the speech and help them carry the voice on the breath without tiring their voice too much.

This technique is also great for a performer’s posture, as we have to stand up straight to allow the technique to work properly, posture significantly helps a performers presence on stage, because it is a symbol of their character’s status.

The quote of the lesson for me, “voice is completely different from speech, it is a noise carried on the breath” helped me to clarify the difference in my head and allowed me to go home an d research.

What I realised is voice and breath are independent factors, breath can function independently but the quality on the voice is affected by the quality on the breath. Voice needs breath to carry and support it.

 
Diagram depicting what happens during intercostal breathing.




Bibliography

Author/s
Year
Title
Edition (if not 1st)
Location Where published
publisher
Ellie Darvill         2012                      Verbal quote: “ voice is completely different from speech, it is a noise carried on the breath.”



http://g09respirationr3a.wikispaces.com/file/view/sports-training-diaphragm-breathing1.jpg/337689418/sports-training-diaphragm-breathing1.jpg (Accessed 31 Oct 2012)




Tuesday, 30 October 2012

Evaluation: The Risk 4.2


This evaluation is both self-analysis, feedback received by peers (and audience) and lectures.

Unit 28: Development of Acting Skills

LO 2.2 – Personally I believe that I used minimal acting skills in this role, yes I was a character but because I was a narrator I felt I was simply telling a story at points, I didn’t really have any objectives or subjective to work with. This is mainly because my character was improvised.

 There was no depth to the character more just a facilitator which didn’t leave me room to explore or create anything with her, but helped the flow of the piece. When it came to feedback and watching the performance on video; then I got ideas for an emerging character which could be developed.

If there were to be another performance of this play then I could have made my character The Narrator, an astral projection of “Ziggy”; the mentioned friend/real person spoken about in The Speakers speech.
After Ziggy’s failed suicide attempt she has been left “brain dead”, now that I have time to think about her more, I like the thought of her being a character that wonders off in her mind and manifest out her body trying to help people like her.

If I had thought of this before then I could have built a narrator who had the objective to make the audience want to help and get more involved, I also think I would have created supreme objective of urgency because she could see what direction was heading in. I think this could have helped me developed as an actor thinking about factors behind why my character wants to save others and how she could. And I believe it would have helped the overall performance because it could have created a more “character driven narrative”. 

Unit 29: Devising Performance
 
LO 1.1 Devised performances are used by well established companies such as complicite to produce new an innotative drama pieces that incorperate multimedia or to see ways of creating plays with a differenct perspective. Devising drama as an esemble I believe helps the cohort to bond and have an ownership towards the piece because they've all had an input in the direction the play is headed.
LO 1.2 A range of techniques used by companies to devise a performances is by producing stimuli for the cohort:
  • Artefacts - Photographs, paintings, masks, props, costumes, sculptuers, art objects.
  • Music
  • Newspaper and magazine articles
  • Poetry
  • Extract of plays text
  • Book extracts
  • Films, TV, video stills or clips
  • Live theatre performances
The company have time to play, look and experiment with the objects or text that they have. They can then use a multiple of techniques such as freeze frames and tableaux to build an image. live frozen images are like photographs, it gives time for the cohort to focus in on the shapes the body is creating and the facial reactions being produced.
LO 1.3 With my group the techniques we used were marking the moment, narration and cross cutting. We marked the moment two times in the piece and both times we did it in a literal way by highlighting the centeral actor/actors on the stage with a stop light, e.g the arguement between Chelsea and Alex: the action was frozen around them the rest of the ensemble blackedout and a spotlight on them for the arguement, we chose to mark this moment because its when his life takes a turn for the worst and we wanted the audience to think is it because of the break-up that leads him to want to take his own life? A second mark the moment in our piece is when Alex (being played by Jon) is cutting his wrist, we used music and the higlight to create tension in the piece which we hoped would play on the audiences emotions so they could empathise with the character; this is because with promenade performances the audience inhabit, not just watch, a space.


LO 4.1 My group was fortunate enough to have two opportunities to have feedback on our performance. The first time was directly after the performance, whilst the rest of the ensemble began singing Jon and Sinead gave out balloons, once the singing had ended they asked our audience “if you thought we have portrayed our piece in a sensitive and educational light then please pop your balloons”. At the time every single person popped their balloons, which I think speaks volumes and we can class that as a success. 
 
We went for that method of evaluation, because it was a risk; risk being the overall objective of the whole project, and because we wanted to do something outside the box which wasn’t the generic questionnaire. 

 During the peer evaluation session however when everyone had a chance to reflect upon that method of evaluation a resounding question we received from most people was “now the balloons are popped what have you got from that except the answer to a closed question? “
 
LO 4.2 I think one way we could make have made our evaluation method better is by having put a rolled up brief questionnaire inside the balloons or if we had had time then we should have set up a web blackboard or a physical one where people could anonymously post what they thought, how it affected them and offer more portals for help on suicide prevention in case anyone in our audience really needs that kind of help/advice. 
 
Another feedback that we got a lot was interest in the ‘Aspirations’ at the start if the play, to us the cast and creators the characters where facilitators and a means to an ends to symbolise the lack of aspiration dreams and plan for a future that our protagonist Alex had, over they aroused great curiosity in the audience and they wish for them to be “explored and developed more”.

If we were to perform this piece again we could work in making the play more “character driven” and developing those characters briefly glimpsed at the start. Companies such as Grid Iron who mainly only do sight specific performances adapt their pieces to new sites when touring their work or they adapt it to the stage. Our group had the opportunity to adapt it to the stage but we thought ours definately needed the sight for it to have the same impact, what regret is thats we didn't take the 'risk' and try to adapt it to the stage.

UNIT 73: Voice and Speech Development and Practice
 
 Once I was assigned the part of narrator and I knew that we were doing a promenade performance that would take me into a vast space outdoors I knew my voice would be my biggest tool that I would have to hone during this performance.

 LO 4.2 So I began to research how I could project my voice more powerfully to build on my previous range. I landed across a video by Anna Berstein (“How Can I Project My Voice More Powerfully”) it’s just under two minutes. The most profound thing I learned was that “your voice has no power, it is the breath that projects the voice”. This lead me to conclusion that I would have to work on my breathing control especially since I would be walking quite a distance with the audience and at one point doing a brief sprint.







LO 4.2 Knowing this I explored relaxation methods and did previous singing exercise I had been thought to retain breath for longer.  Such as counting in the air and focusing on the diaphragm. Doing exercises such as “pulling the purse string” this is where you focus on the diaphragm and clip it almost taunt whilst pushing air at the same time.

 Watching back the performance and from feedback the audience members all said they could hear me so I would consider that learning objective met, in hearing I also wonder if it was with clarity because I practiced my diction and emphasising my words.
 
Other areas I worked on was pitch and tone because I was speaking for a very long time, it was almost like a scrolling monologue so when it was appropriate I changed me tone and emotion behind the words. Such as the walk from point “B to C” when I began shouting “BECAUSE HE WANTED TO SHOW THEM HE COULD DO SOMETHING RIGHT, SOMETHING ON HIS OWN!”
I had to maintain my volume and clear voice but inflict a painful and angry tone. 
 
LO 4.2 From the audience stepping back and appearing taken aback when I did that I think that was successful. 
However because my character was emotionally limited I believed I was also vocally limited when it came the emotional I could inflict into my voice and tone; that is a failure on my part because this could have been the time that actually got to explore emotionally.


Bibliography

Web sites used:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/drama/exploring/textsrev1.shtml
http://dramaresource.com/resources/features/devising-theatre
http://www.gridiron.org.uk/CompanyBackground.aspx
http://www.scottisharts.org.uk/1/artsinscotland/drama/features/archive/themepromenade.aspx





Performance ! The Risk 4.2


Thursday 18th October 2012 




The performance started with my character, The Narrator, I was located downstage-centre whilst the rest of the cast were positioned in a straight horizontal line behind me, spanning from upstage left to right; in rehearsals we plotted (‘blocked’) out this staging to place emphasis on what my character was saying but also to create a conscious proxemics between my character, the audience and the other characters. I was the “middle man”.

Being so close to the audience and directly addressing them, thus breaking the fourth wall further emphasised this, by breaking the fourth wall my character facilitated a dialogue between the audience and the characters. We wanted to establish this line of communication so that later they would be far more open to it when I would be addressing them solely (during the walk about) and there would be no action for them to witness.

 It was also a part of our stylistic element because we were going for a non-naturalistic play; we wanted a production that was almost like a story book with a “Once upon a time” narrative flare but with a modern twist that highlighted that ‘Suicide’ is real and far more pressing than some of us care to think about. We wanted our audience to “think this could happen to me or someone I know and what would I do?” But we also wanted to address and be sensitive to people who might be going through it, because even though we had a dictated audience that does not mean we knew their personal circumstances. 

That is why during, The Speaker’s; narrative about “My friend Ziggy” I started to hand out fliers when she addressed the audience saying “If you feel alone, speak to someone I beg you!” This was done because although our piece is to entertain our main aim was to inform and educate that there is help out there, and that it’s not always a “big thing” or event that triggers bouts of depression or suicidal thoughts. 

The fliers contained numbers to real suicide help lines and internet web pages, other real information in our play were the statistics being held up at the back by the masked characters in the midpoint of scene two. 




During the end of scene two, I instructed the audience to leave the Hexagon theatre and meet me in the foyer of The MAC; this was so I could begin the promenade element to our performance. However before that, I let the music play (“Nobody Knows by Pink”), whilst Jonathan (Jon) one of the actors playing our protagonist Alex, sat hunched over and crying due to his actions early in the scene, where he depicted of one many self-harming processes, in which he was methodically slashing away at his wrist.

I waited because; I wanted the lyrics of the song “Nobody knows, but me, that I sometimes cry” etc  to really sink in, especially after what they had just witnessed because the song was chosen to evoke a reflective/sad emotional state from our audience. And it worked because I could see and hear members of the audience crying. 

Once I met the audience in the foyer of The MAC I ushered them outside, instead of starting my narrative straight away this is because I had timed everything I had to say during my groups rehearsals and knew that is if I began too early I would run out of scripted material before I reached ‘point B’.

The moving from location to location or “A to B to C” was quite demanding on me as a performer and the play. This is because I had to keep the audience occupied with the storyline whilst detailing mundane aspects of Alex’s life “On Wednesday he watched the T.V. from dusk till dawn”, whilst having to project a great deal because we were outside in a vast space and my voice stood a risk of being lost or swallowed up. 

I believe I managed to project to the point that everyone could hear me.

The two outside locations: the bench by the fair ground and the bridge, where the other two Alex’s waited in character where also quite effective they were like still shots, images the audience could absorb and associate with the characters words. 

However I’m not sure if it was because the audience was spread out or because actors in my ensemble could not hear/project enough some cues where missed, but instead of seeing this as a negative I think it was a good thing because it allowed the actors that it happened to, to improvise their way around the miss haps. 


At the end of our performance we decided to sing the song (“Lean On Me” the Bill Withers version), this decision was made in the rehearsal period, it was a democratic vote on whether to have it or not. Personally I think it was the right song done for the right reasons. The song was there to uplift members of the audience after the emotional journey we had taken them on.

The Old Man, played by Dannel began with a verse of the song upon which the rest of the ensemble joined in and we encouraged the audience to which they joined in because it’s a well know song. I believe it helped to raise spirits which was its intent and to signal a positive end.

The end of the play is Kev’s Alex just sat still on the bridge, the thought whether he jumps or not is left up to the audience. However on looking back at the video of the performance I do not think a long enough pause was left, thus this may have gone over the audiences head.